Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Mitchell v. Norris
as 1:2012cv01158
Plaintiff:
Idella Mitchell
Defendant:
Attorney Randolph Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gragg v. McKain et al
as 4:2011cv01507
Plaintiff:
Chynethia Gragg
Defendant:
Douglas McKain , City of Sugar Land, Texas and Heath Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
LeBlanc et al v. The City of Haltom City et al
as 4:2010cv00812
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company, 21st Century National Insurance Company, The City of Haltom City and others
Plaintiff:
Michael LeBlanc and DSW Masters Holding Corp doing business as Collision Masters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Norris et al v. Center Housing Authority et al
as 9:2009cv00123
Defendant:
Center Housing Authority and Shirley Shofner
Plaintiff:
Sandra Norris, Helen Thedford and Y'Nasha Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norris et al v. Center Housing Authority
as 9:2009cv00121
Defendant:
Center Housing Authority
Plaintiff:
Sandra Norris, Helen Thedford and Y'Nasha Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
