Cases 21 - 30 of 61
CHARLES v. HOPE CAFFAE/COFFEE SHOP et al
as 2:2019cv04238
Plaintiff:
PETER CHARLES
Defendant:
BETHESDA PROJECT, STARBUCKS ON 3RD AND SOUTH, HOPE CAFFAE/COFFEE SHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. et al v. THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2016cv04669
Plaintiff:
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. , CRESCENT CAB , FREEDOM TAXI and others
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and VINCENT J. FENERTY, JR.
Movant:
BUCKS COUNTY, SERVICES INC. , GERMANTOWN CAB COMPANY , THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Respondent:
MAVERICK STRATEGIES , LYFT, INC. and RED MAVERICK MEDIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLD YORK LLC et al v. TOWNSHIP OF ABINGTON, et. al.
as 2:2016cv01731
Plaintiff:
OLD YORK LLC
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF ABINGTON and KENNETH J. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
OLD YORK LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF ABINGTON
as 2:2015cv02089
Plaintiff:
OLD YORK LLC
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF ABINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
