Cases 21 - 30 of 215
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FUENTES v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv03106
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS FUENTES
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PHILPOT, et al v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2021cv03067
Plaintiff:
RONNECE MARTIN PHILPOT
Defendant:
R. P. and GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
MOHARAM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2021cv02607
Plaintiff:
FAHMI AHMED MOHARAM
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TERRORIST SCREENING CENTER, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS v. HEAD et al
as 1:2021cv02670
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRIS HEAD, JOHN EOFF, MARY JEAN CREAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRONS v. KEMP
as 1:2021cv02452
Plaintiff:
TONI IRONS
Defendant:
BRIAN P. KEMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZUBUKO v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2021cv02450
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant:
VANESSA L. BRYANT and THOMAS P. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
SUMERU v. YELLEN et al
as 1:2021cv02389
Plaintiff:
TAANSEN SUMERU
Defendant:
JANET YELLEN, CHARLES RETTIG, WILLIAM M. PAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02038
Plaintiff:
SONIA POWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHEN S. TROTT, THOMAS O. RICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
