Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Pringle v. Fruchtenicht, et al.
as 1:2019cv00408
Defendant:
Sylvia Diaz, Christopher Smalling, Judy Mesick and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela D Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle et al v. NFI Industries, Inc.
as 1:2019cv06633
Plaintiff:
Terry Evans, Clifford Turnipseed, Tyson Pringle and others
Defendant:
NFI Industries, Inc. and National Distribution Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Barton v. Otsuka Pharmaceuticals et al
as 1:2019cv04758
Defendant:
The Legal Aid Society, NYC Office of Mental Hygiene Kitchen, NYS Office of Mental Hygiene and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Sean Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019at00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Pryor v. Reed et al
as 1:2018cv07958
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, a municipal corporation, Chicago Police Officer Mason Jose, Star #5441, Chicago Police Officer Tabatha Pringle, Star #110047 and others
Plaintiff:
Seth Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. Gentry et al
as 1:2018cv00347
Defendant:
Cindy McDonald, Judy Mesick, Shannon Cluney and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. Cardall et al
as 2:2018cv02035
Defendant:
Cindy McDonald, Brent Cardall, Sandy Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pringle v. Cardall et al
as 2:2018at01231
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Defendant:
Brent Cardall, County of Yolo, Yolo County Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
