Cases 21 - 30 of 41
RILEY et al v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2015cv00212
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, DOYLE LEGAL CORPORATION, P.C. and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
FRED RILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SRIVASTAVA v. JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01848
Defendant:
AFNI, INC., GREGORY BALLARD, SARAH EVANS BARKER and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BILLINGS v. RILEY HOSPITAL
as 1:2012cv01800
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HAROLD BILLINGS, Jr.
Defendant:
RILEY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01014
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VFW POST 2953 et al v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN LEGION POST 265, AMVETS POST 84, GERMANIA MAENNECHOR and others
Defendant:
STEPHANIE BRINKERHOFF-RILEY, CITY OF EVANSVILLE, JOHN FRIEND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
