Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Jackson, Sr. et al v. Travis County, Texas et al
as 9:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
Carl Riley Jackson, Sr., Charles L Jackson, Connie Sue Jackson and others
Defendant:
Travis County, Texas, Kelley Whalen, Deputy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Riley v. Loggins, et al
as 4:2015cv01242
Plaintiff:
June Anne Riley
Defendant:
Amy Loggins, Sierra Batchan and Gustavo Rivera, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gjemre v. Leffingwell et al
as 1:2013cv00729
Defendant:
City of Austin, Sheryl Cole, Karen Kennard and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mitchell Gjemre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Riley v. Azer Texas LLC d/b/a AutoZone
as 4:2013cv01587
Plaintiff:
Edna Riley
Defendant:
Azer Texas LLC d/b/a AutoZone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Marquez, et al v. Garnett, et al
as 5:2013cv00168
Defendant:
Barbara Garnett, Brenda Riley and South San Antonio Independent School District
Plaintiff:
Paulina Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez et al v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2011cv00993
Defendant:
Art Acevedo, City of Austin, Sheryl Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Sanchez and Kristopher Sleeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
