Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Smith et al v. McKinney
as 2:2011cv00899
Plaintiff:
Linda Smith and John Doe
Defendant:
Reese McKinney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Taylor v. Reese
as 2:2010cv00259
Plaintiff:
Fernandos Taylor
Defendant:
Eugene W. Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Missildine et al v. Community Action Committee, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00419
Plaintiff:
Shiloh Missildine, Shiloh Missildine, Shiloh Missildine and others
Defendant:
Community Action Committee, Inc., Community Action Agency of Chambers-Tallapoosa-Coosa, David Boleware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. City of Montgomery et al (MAG+)
as 2:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Austin
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Celia Dixon and Eugene W. Reese
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Price v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2008cv00856
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Price
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Bob Riley, Bryce Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery, Alabama et al
as 2:2007cv00943
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, Alabama, Reese McKinney and D. T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2007cv00814
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, Alabama, Reese McKinney and D. T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
