Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04635
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
STOLTZFUS et al v. HUTCHINS et al
as 2:2017cv00359
Defendant:
GEOFFREY CANFIELD, SHAWN CLOVER, JUSTIN COLE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RIEHL and JOHN STOLTZFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
ASSIST INC. et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
ASSIST INC. and DIANNA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BUREAU OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DIVISION OF DISABILITY AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, MAJDI EL-ALAMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Springer v. Peru City of et al
as 3:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Springer
Defendant:
Peru City of, Russell Tussey and Fredrick Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZWILLING et al v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al
as 4:2015cv00130
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE DEPT. and STATE OF INDIANA
First Name Unknown:
TROOPER SMITH
Plaintiff:
MARY ZWILLING and SHELTON RUSSELL ZWILLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00675
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
