Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Homewood et al v. Wolcott et al
as 3:2021cv00041
Defendant:
Town of Wolcott, Town of Wolcott Planning & Zoning Commission, David Kalinowski and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Homewood and 47 North Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01881
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benchmark Trading, LTD. et al v. Lamont
as 3:2020cv01078
Plaintiff:
Beers Apartments, LLC, Benchmark Trading, LTD., Birdseye Development Company and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alberty v. Hunter et al
as 3:2020cv01014
Defendant:
Robert A. Hunter and Stephen J. Samson
Plaintiff:
Wendy Alberty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dilley v. Old Saybrook et al
as 3:2020cv00795
Defendant:
Stephen Hackett, Town of Old Saybrook and Tyler Schultz
Plaintiff:
Danielle Dilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Brasher-Cunningham et al
as 3:2019cv01981
Defendant:
Sarah Beers, National Conference of the United Church of Christ, Debora M. Hess and others
Plaintiff:
David R Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunbar v. Jepsen et al
as 3:2019cv01163
Defendant:
James Duncan, Richard Mahoney, Joseph Pirez and others
Plaintiff:
Timolyn Deneen Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2019cv00853
Defendant:
Nathalie Mclaughlin, Adam Szeps, Kenneth Fortes and others
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Brasher-Cunningham et al
as 3:2019cv00758
Plaintiff:
David Robert Thomas
Defendant:
National Conference of the United Church of Christ, Debora M. Hess, First Congregational Church of Guilford and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
