Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Sanchez et al v. United States Office of Border Patrol et al
as 3:2012cv05378
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez , Ismael Ramos Contreras and Ernest Grimes
Defendant:
United States Office of Border Patrol , United States Customs and Border Protection , Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez, Ismael Ramos Contreras and Ernest Grimes
Defendant:
United States Office of Border Patrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez et al v. Diaz et al
as 2:2012cv03031
Plaintiff:
Jose C Sanchez , Elizabeth Sanchez and Jose S Sanchez, Jr
Defendant:
Adam Diaz , Jane Doe Diaz , Derrick Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. USCIS
as 2:2011cv03122
Plaintiff:
Tiburtio Sanchez
Defendant:
USCIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2011cv01583
Plaintiff:
Allan Parmelee
Defendant:
Tony Dunnington , Harlan Finch , Douglas Waddington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sanchez et al v. Grandview School District No 200
as 2:2010cv03118
Plaintiff:
Maria Sanchez and Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Grandview School District No 200
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
May v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2009cv00892
Plaintiff:
Judith C May
Defendant:
City of Seattle, S Sanchez, R Woolery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
