Cases 21 - 30 of 228
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Adamson v. City of Taylor et al
as 2:2022cv12611
Plaintiff:
Veronica Adamson
Defendant:
City of Taylor, Thomas Amross, Jordan Chamberlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
Emmett Taylor
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of, Jason McCullough, Tim Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Ashton v. Okemos Public Schools et al
as 1:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
Pauline Ashton
Defendant:
Okemos Public Schools, Okemos Public Schools Board of Education, Dean Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Taylor, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12066
Plaintiff:
Dale Bryant
Defendant:
Taylor, City of, Max Dorflinger, Aaron Layne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. County of Calhoun et al
as 4:2022cv11928
Plaintiff:
Emmett Taylor
Defendant:
County of Calhoun, Conservation Officer Jason McCullough, Sgt. Tim Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Medilodge of Taylor
as 2:2022cv11919
Plaintiff:
Brian Harry Marshall
Defendant:
Medilodge of Taylor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
