Cases 21 - 30 of 290
Konecny v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
J. Alan Konecny and J Alan Konecny
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Collin County Texas, Tarrant County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Clervain et al v. Hughs et al
as 4:2022mc00612
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Honorable Terry Petteway et al v. Galveston County, Texas et al
as 3:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Honorable Terry Petteway, Honorable Derrick Rose, Honorable Michael Montez and others
Defendant:
Galveston County, Texas and Honorable Mark Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Morris v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Morris
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, George Gallagher and Scott Wisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv03722
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Homeland Security, Terry Muise and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Carrasco v. Henkell
as 7:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Erik Carrasco
Defendant:
Terry Henkell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
