Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Monroe v. CMMG, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04172
Defendant:
CMMG, Inc. , James Watson , Tyson Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Watson v. St. Louis County Police Department
as 4:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Willie Watson
Defendant:
St. Louis County Police Department , Collector of Revenue , USAA Garrison Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
as 4:2014cv01687
Plaintiff:
Willie Watson
Defendant:
St. Louis County Police Department, USAA Garrison Insurance Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Watson v. USAA Garrison Insurance Company et al
as 4:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
Willie Watson
Defendant:
USAA Garrison Insurance Company, County Police Department, Tim Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Tripp et al
as 6:2013cv03278
Plaintiff:
Karen Kay Young
Defendant:
Pamela Tripp, Brandon Garner, Dalton Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00541
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watson v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2013cv00782
Plaintiff:
Willie Watson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, St. Louis County and Chris Koster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
