Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Franks v. Hadder et al
as 6:2012cv02817
Plaintiff: D'Arvy Shawn Franks
Defendant: Lowell Adam Hadder, John Mary Tirey, Walker County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrison v. Hadder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv02659
Plaintiff: Gerald Garrison
Defendant: Lowell Adam Hadder , John Mark Tirey , Walker County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00342
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Vincent L Rowell, Estate of et al v. Walker Baptist Medical Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv03439
Plaintiff: Vincent L Rowell, Estate of , Heracio Pickett , Victor Pickett and others
Defendant: Walker Baptist Medical Center , David Williamson , John Tirey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv03218
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mooneyham v. Tirey et al
as 7:2011cv01280
Plaintiff: Rita Mooneyham
Defendant: John Tirey , Walker County Commission, The , Bruce Hamrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv02626
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv02493
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01748
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wade et al v. Oakman, City of et al
as 2:2009cv01554
Plaintiff: Sharon E Wade and William E Wade
Defendant: Oakman, City of, Matt B Webb, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?