Cases 21 - 30 of 30
TAPP v. THE EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
CARLESTER W. TAPP
Defendant:
THE EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and AFFIANT B. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01777
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
UNGER et al v. BLEVINS-FOSTER et al
as 1:2012cv00948
Defendant:
MELISSA BLEVINS-FOSTER, JERRY W. COOK, DELAWARE COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES UNGER and TAMORA UNGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Watson v. Furnish et al
as 1:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Gabriel Furnish, Justin Reichard, Thomas Plummer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Watson v. Fuhrman et al
as 1:2009cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Watson and William Watson
Defendant:
J Fuhrman, P Bartrom and Officer John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEAVER v. COMBS et al
as 4:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
NGA WEAVER
Defendant:
JESSE COMBS, TAMI WATSON, GRAND VICTORIA CASINO & RESORT, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARLOW v. CITY OF MITCHELL et al
as 4:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
MARILYN S. BARLOW
Defendant:
CITY OF MITCHELL, MORRIS W. CHASTAIN, BYRON W. STEELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Watson v. South Bend City of et al
as 3:2007cv00299
Plaintiff:
Tim Watson
Defendant:
South Bend City of, South Bend Police Department, Jason McNicholas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
