Cases 31 - 40 of 641
Haug et al v. Starke County
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Haug and Anita Haug
Defendant:
Starke County and Starke County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
CHESTON J. ROBERTS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, DIEGO MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
MIDDLETON v. PYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv00729
Petitioner:
ROBERT R. MIDDLETON
Respondent:
PAULA K. PYATTE, REBECCA M. EIMERMAN, BRIAN H. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CLARK v. DAVIDSON et al
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CLARK
Defendant:
LEE H DAVIDSON and JORDAN R HARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v Portage Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ann Green and Robert Michael Nagel
Defendant:
Portage Police Department, Ofc. Robert D Nichols and Robert Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. SNOWDEN
as 1:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE CLARK
Defendant:
ERIC SNOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAMUELS v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SAMUELS
Defendant:
SHANE WILLIAMS and SHANE B. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
