Cases 31 - 40 of 976
Murphy v. Drinkard et al
as 2:2023cv12390
Plaintiff:
Autina Murphy
Defendant:
James Drinkard, Jason Melton and Stanley Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Huron, Township of et al
as 2:2023cv12376
Plaintiff:
Elka Gaston Williams
Defendant:
Huron Township, Adam Sheehan Sheehan, Huron, Township of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamilton v. Rice
as 2:2023cv12304
Plaintiff:
Lacino Hamilton
Defendant:
William Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lockhart v. Shabazz et al
as 2:2023cv12180
Plaintiff:
Jameel Lockhart
Defendant:
Abdul Shabazz, Sean B. Perkins and Zelah Williams
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hunsaker et al v. Imperial Beverage Company
as 2:2023cv12145
Plaintiff:
Brian Hunsaker, Donald Fritz, Nico Frazier and others
Defendant:
Imperial Beverage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2023cv12066
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan also known as d/b/a BCBSM, d and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Doing business as BCBSM
Plaintiff:
Shannon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mallory v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2023cv11882
Plaintiff:
Herman Mallory
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Calvin Adkins, Hamza Elmelegy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price et al v. Chippewa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Diane Veen Price, Sherri Rockwell, Daniel Clement and others
Defendant:
Chippewa, County of, Carmen M. Fazzari, Marjorie Hank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
