Cases 31 - 40 of 19,753
El v. District Court Clark County et al
as 2:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Rasondo Meeks El
Defendant:
District Court Clark County, Nevada Family Division, Cheryl B Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
J.B.H. v. Knox County et al
as 4:2024cv04096
Plaintiff:
J. B. H.
Defendant:
Knox County, Raymond A. Cavanaugh, Bridget E. Pletz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hollier et al v. Garber et al
as 6:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hollier, Danny Hollier, Sr, Katherine Hollier and others
Defendant:
Mark Garber, Keavuin Richard, Frank Sonnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Michael McGuire, et al v. Attorney General, State of Alabama, et al
as 24-11731
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MCGUIRE, J E B and K L L
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and SECRETARY OF THE ALABAMA LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 a Title II Civil Rights Act 1964
Heard v. Mahakal Sahai d/b/a 7 Eleven
as 8:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Tamoris Heard
Defendant:
Mahakal Sahai d/b/a 7 Eleven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Motley v. Vandyke et al
as 2:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Courtney Motley
Defendant:
B. Vandyke, Carlos Silva, Jeri Dermanetian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
