Cases 31 - 40 of 299
Brown v. City of Gary, et al
as 2:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Louis Brown
Defendant:
CITY OF GARY, INDIDANA, Gary Common Council, Gary Board of Public Works and Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MENDOZA v. BROWN
as 1:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
CHELLARISE MENDOZA
Defendant:
KARL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE 4 et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4 and JANE DOE 8
Defendant:
SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
MAFFETT v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
WILLIE G. MAFFETT
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPT., SETH GORMAN, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BROWN v. FOGEL et al
as 2:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
SHANE BROWN
Defendant:
SAMUEL FOGEL, BRAYLON GAGNON, VIRGIL LANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MICKLES v. MIRIO et al
as 2:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
MIRIO, AARRON REYNOLDS, PATRICE POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
