Civil Rights Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Bumpas v. Correct Care Solutions et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00523
Plaintiff: Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions, CCA Metro Davidson County Detention Facility, Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Allen v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01043
Plaintiff: Candy Allen
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00465
Plaintiff: Capreace E. Smith
Defendant: The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Tammy Hines and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Livingston v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2007cv02496
Plaintiff: Charles Livingston
Defendant: Mark Luttrell, Jr. and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2007cv02491
Plaintiff: William Washington
Defendant: Mark Luttrell, Jr., Shelby County Sheriff's Department, John E Newby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County et al
as 3:2007cv00731
Plaintiff: Candy Allen
Defendant: Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Daron Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nicholson v. Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2007cv00452
Plaintiff: James Nicholson, Jr. and James Nicholson, Jr.
Defendant: Davidson County, Tennessee, The Davidson County Sheriff's Department/Jail, Daron Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?