Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Belcher v. Laymon et al
as 3:2013cv00015
Defendant:
Paul Laymon, City of Sevierville, Tennessee and Shawn Crawford
Plaintiff:
John Mark Belcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathes v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00496
Plaintiff:
Peggy Duncan Mathes
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddins v. Cooper et al
as 4:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Denis Eddins
Defendant:
Robert E. Cooper, Charles F Crawford, W. Michael McCown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Kopinski v. Crawford et al
as 3:2008cv00176
Plaintiff:
Kellie Kopinski
Defendant:
Cindy Crawford, Stacy Griffin, William Angel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eddins v. Cooper et al
as 4:2008cv00031
Plaintiff:
Dennis Eddins
Defendant:
Robert E Cooper, Charles F Crawford, W Michael McCown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
