Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Heilman v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2014cv00264
Plaintiff:
Eric Heilman
Defendant:
Jefferson County , City of Beaumont , Beaumont Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Foddrill v. Castro et al
as 5:2013cv00051
Defendant:
Diego M. Bernal, City Attorney Michael Bernard, Leticia Cantu and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Foddrill, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rynearson v. Richter
as 5:2011cv00705
Defendant:
Sam Adams, Bexar County, City of San Antonio and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Rynearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Varela v. City of Progreso et al
as 7:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Eloy Varela
Defendant:
City of Progreso , City of Progreso Police Department , City of Progreso Chief of Police Alberto Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of San Antonio, et al.
as 5:2010cv00274
Defendant:
Officer FELIPE RAMOS, City of San Antonio, Officer ALFRED A GONZALES and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Henderson v. Williams et al
as 3:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
David E. Henderson
Defendant:
Willie E. Williams, Chief Of Police and Alice Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FERNANDEZ et al v. City of Pharr, Texas et al
as 7:2007cv00257
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO T. FERNANDEZ and FELIPE T. FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
City of Pharr, Texas, PHARR POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE, RUBEN VILLESCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Sculley et al
as 5:2007cv00747
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Pedro Garcia, Chief of Police William McManus and others
Plaintiff:
Paschal Evans and Derrick Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
