Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
COOKE v. LUX et al
as 1:2017cv00589
IMPD:
Z. CARVER, S. FOLEY, W. HALE and others
Plaintiff:
JAHRAD L. COOKE
Defendant:
MATTHEW KUBACKI and MICHAEL LUX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Hurlburt et al
as 1:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cook
Defendant:
Jacob Hurlburt , John Doe 1-10 and City of Marion, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELIQUITECH, INC. v. COOK et al
as 1:2016cv03361
Defendant:
DAVID COLEMAN, DAVID COOK, DALE GRUBB and others
Plaintiff:
ELIQUITECH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
COOK v. HURLBURT et al
as 1:2016cv03073
Defendant:
CITY OF MARION, INDIANA, JOHN DOE 1-10 and JACOB HURLBURT
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOODCAT, LLC v. COOK et al
as 1:2016cv01514
Intervenor:
CLOUDTOWN, LLC, DNM VENTURES, LLC, LICENSED E-LIQUID MANUFACTURING LLC and others
Defendant:
DAVID COLEMAN, DAVID COOK, DALE GRUBB and others
Movant:
DB VAPES, LLC
Plaintiff:
GOODCAT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
