Cases 31 - 40 of 98
CALLAHAM v. BERGEN COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv14827
Defendant:
ERICA CHMIELEWSKI, LORI M. TIRRI, WILLIAM WOODWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. CALLAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. BURKE et al
as 3:2018cv13041
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Richard Burke, The Warren County Prosecutor's Office, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD et al
as 2:2018cv08240
Plaintiff:
NAOMI JOHNSON
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERT ESTELLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALLAHAM v. BERGEN COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv04788
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. CALLAHAM
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY, JAMES TEDESCO, III, BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY et al v. COUNTY OF HUDSON et al
as 2:2017cv02875
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MURRAY , PATRICIA AIKEN and EDPDLAW, LTD.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HUDSON, HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THOMAS A. DEGISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00472
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
TORRES v. BOROUGH OF BARRINGTON et al
as 1:2016cv06134
Plaintiff:
ARSENIO TORRES
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF BARRINGTON , DAVID ROBERTS , MICHAEL MINARDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
VAN TASSEL et al v. OCEAN COUNTY et al
as 3:2016cv04761
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY VAN TASSEL , MICKEY MALDONADO and ALEJANDRA SANTIAGO
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY, OCEAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF LAKEWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
