Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NEELY v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2014cv01403
Defendant:
ZACHARY HARRIS, M. STREETER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FREEMAN NEELY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. LUTHERAN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv01085
Plaintiff:
JAMES FREEMAN
Defendant:
LUTHERAN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, VICTORIA BUSCH, ROBERT BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2014cv01047
Plaintiff:
JAMES FREEMAN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, TIMENE FARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FREEMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv05713
Plaintiff:
WARREN FREEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT, THOMAS LICIARDELLO, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUMMERS v. FREEMAN et al
as 5:2013cv02227
Plaintiff:
KIT SUMMERS
Defendant:
JONATHAN FREEMAN and THE BOROUGH OF TRAINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
FREEMAN v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2013cv01579
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FREEMAN
Defendant:
WILLIAM MURPHY and THE CITY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
