Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Hunter et al v. Donahue et al
as 1:2013cv01018
Plaintiff:
Mickey Fred Hunter and Sandra Farley
Defendant:
Michael Donahue , Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corporation and Corrections Corporation of America (CCA)
Miscellaneou:
Linda Fulghum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Coleman et al v. Hamilton County Government et al
as 1:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Brandon Raymond Jones and Thomas Joseph Coleman, III
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government , Fred R Skillern, James A Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Fowler et al v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
George Fowler and Marilyn Potter
Defendant:
Fentress County, Tennessee and Fred R. Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Tennessee et al v. Waters et al
as 3:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, William England, Peggy Marshall and others
Defendant:
Larry Waters , Phil King , Gary Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Glass v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Claude L Glass
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, DHS, CSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
