Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Hurlston V. City of Princeton, Texas, et al
as 4:2013cv00757
Plaintiff:
Glen W. Hurlston
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Jeffery Barnett, Robert Mitchnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLean et al v. Holder et al
as 4:2013cv01759
Plaintiff:
Vicki Fanning McLean
Defendant:
Eric Holder, United States Attorney Generals Office, Stanwood Duval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sturgeon v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Richard Glen Sturgeon
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Harris County, Pat Lykos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Filed In Error
as 4:2009cv04135
Defendant:
Amidee Capital Group d/b/a Harbor Glen Apartments
Plaintiff:
Filed in error
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flores v. Amidee Capital Group d/b/a Harbor Glen Apartments
as 3:2009cv00312
Plaintiff:
Arquimendez Flores
Defendant:
Amidee Capital Group d/b/a Harbor Glen Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reedom v. US Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 4:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Reedom
Defendant:
US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Tarrant County Commissioners, City of Fort Worth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haven v. Dickerson et al
as 4:2009cv00647
Plaintiff:
Michael Haven
Defendant:
Glen Dickerson and City Of Houston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
