Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Wright v. Bently et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Robert Bently, Spencer Collin, A C Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Turner et al
as 2:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Anthony Turner, James Mason, Bobby White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv02302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Crawford v. United States Navy
as 5:2013cv01293
Plaintiff:
Raymmond Glenn Crawford
Defendant:
United States Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crawford v. Pharmacists - Walgreens Pharmacy Store et al
as 5:2013cv01294
Plaintiff:
Raymmond Glenn Crawford
Defendant:
Pharmacists - Walgreens Pharmacy Store, Walmart Pharmacy and Store, CVS Pharmacy and Store and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Binion v. McGriff, et al (MAG+)
as 2:2012cv01040
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Shelby Binion
Defendant:
Glenn McGriff, Robert M. Martin and Kevin Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Witwicki v. Circuit Court of Coffee County, et al (MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00920
Plaintiff:
William Witwicki
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Coffee County , Shannon R. Clark , James M. Counts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Agboola v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2011cv02025
Plaintiff:
Adedayo Anthony Agboola
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of and Glenn W Pleasant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caffey v. Alabama Supreme Court et al
as 2:2010cv03050
Plaintiff:
Sherryl Snodgrass Caffey
Defendant:
Alabama Supreme Court, Sue Bell Cobb, Champ Lyons, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
