Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Horen et al v. Board of Education of the City of Toledo Public School District et al
as 3:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Glenn S. Horen and Joanne E. Horen
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City of Toledo Public School District and Thom Billau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ben Isma'el Tribal Republic et al v. Leland et al
as 3:2011cv02066
Plaintiff:
Ben Isma'el Tribal Republic, El Buruj Ben Isma'el Ali-Imuran, Khalid Rafiq Bey and others
Defendant:
Z. Leland, William J. Lauber, Ben E. Diepenbrock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carlet Macklin v. Copeland
as 1:2011cv01157
Plaintiff:
Carlet Macklin
Defendant:
Glenn Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
Angela Preston
Defendant:
City of Akron, Craig Gilbride, Glenn Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hobbs v. Summit County Sheriff et al
as 5:2010cv02069
Plaintiff:
jillian hobbs
Defendant:
Summit County Sheriff, Scott Plymire and Glenn Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perez v. Ross County Commissioners et al
as 2:2010cv00714
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Perez
Defendant:
Ross County Commissioners , Ronald Nichols , Glenn Detty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
