Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Nails v. AAA Auto Insurance et al
as 4:2015cv00638
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
AAA Auto Insurance, Christian Beasly, Carol Hanser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finley v. City of Bowling Green et al
as 2:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Barbara Finley
Defendant:
Jim Moore , City of Bowling Green , Mike Pugh and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Fredrich J. Cruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
Elbert v. City of Kansas City Missouri et al
as 4:2014cv00851
Plaintiff:
Richard Marcelle Elbert
Defendant:
City of Kansas City Missouri, Alvin Brooks, Michael Rader and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ludden v. Maryland Heights Police Department et al
as 4:2014cv01110
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ludden
Defendant:
Maryland Heights Police Department , The City of Maryland Heights , Gil Weingart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meriwether et al v. City of Velda City Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv02152
Plaintiff:
Darnel Meriwether and Michael Thomas
Defendant:
City of Velda City Police Department, Michael Lewis and Jim Ervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Owens et al v. Davis and Goldmark et al
as 6:2013cv03311
Plaintiff:
Terry David Owens
Defendant:
Davis and Goldmark, Marie Blancarte, Jim Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00541
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
