Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdullah-El v. King County Municipal Court et al
as 2:2014cv01437
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Abdullah-El
Defendant:
King County Municipal Court, Snohomish County Municipal Court, Peter S Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE OPENED/TRANSFERRED
as 4:2014cv05060
Plaintiff:
C O
Defendant:
Benton County, Steven Keane, Jon Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C O v. Benton County et al
as 2:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
C O
Defendant:
Benton County , Steven Keane , Jon Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. Kernkamp et al
as 3:2013cv05077
Plaintiff:
Antoinne Littlejohn
Defendant:
Amy Kernkamp, Tacoma Police, Law Enforcement Support Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spice v. Law Office of Brian Roesch et al
as 3:2012cv06005
Plaintiff:
Ted Spice
Defendant:
Law Office of Brian Roesch, Brian Roesch, Doris Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aainfinity v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01868
Plaintiff:
Spaceman O Aainfinity
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Attorney General, United States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seymour v. Awino et al
as 2:2012cv01345
Plaintiff:
Jessica Seymour
Defendant:
Charlotte Awino, CAUSE Program, Grant Learned and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
