Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Patrice Pigram et al v. Eris M.Williams et al
as 2:2015cv04498
Defendant:
A Real Estate & Management Company, Inc., AMC Management, Drew Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Annie J Pigram, Patrice Pigram and Ryane-Lisa White
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Marc Edwards v. John Sedia et al
as 2:2014cv08751
Plaintiff:
Marc Edwards
Defendant:
James A. Harris, Jewell Harris, Jr., Harris Law Firm and others
Clements v. Sojourn Properites, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03914
Plaintiff:
Yoshabel Clements
Defendant:
Sojourn Properites, Inc., Steven G. King, Brilliant Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
VILLAGE INN LLC, et al v City of Whittier, et al
as 8:2013cv01888
Defendant:
Andrew F Adams, Mark S Adams, Baron J Bettenhausen and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CLARO and VILLAGE INN LLC
Bravo v. County of San Diego et al
as 4:2012cv06460
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Bravo
Defendant:
County of San Diego, City of San Diego, Superior Court of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Viorel Muresan v. James J Rodriguez et al
as 2:2012cv04138
Plaintiff:
Viorel Muresan
Defendant:
James J Rodriguez, Marlene S Rodriguez and The Law Firm of Dennis P. Block and Associates
Wright v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 3:2011cv04045
Plaintiff:
Treba L. Wright
Defendant:
Law Firm of Casper, Meadows, Schwartz, & Cook in Walnut Creek, Mercedes Benz Corporation, CHP Officer Mendhall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Enwere v. Sauer & Wagner Law Firm
as 3:2011cv03834
Plaintiff:
Cathy Enwere
Defendant:
Sauer & Wagner Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
