Cases 31 - 40 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engel v. Springfield Missouri Chick Fil A et al
as 3:2017cv05089
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Springfield Missouri Chick Fil A, Branson Missouri Chick Fil A, Kevin Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Engel v. College Of The Ozarks et al
as 3:2017cv05064
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
College Of The Ozarks, Students, Staff, Faculty, Board and Alumni of College of the Ozarks, Dr. Jerry C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Poling et al v. Henry County R-1 School District et al
as 4:2017cv00580
Plaintiff:
Lisa Poling , Danny Poling , Jill Hunt and others
Defendant:
Henry County R-1 School District, Henry County R-1 School District Board of Education, Dr. Kristee Lorenz and others
Cause Of Action: Discrimination in Education - Sex
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Francisco et al v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01455
Plaintiff:
Anne Francisco , Thurman Francisco and Tyler Francisco
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Corizon, LLC, Thomas Villmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
