Cases 31 - 40 of 168
Blankenship v. Town of North Brookfield et al
as 4:2022cv40073
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dee Blankenship
Defendant:
Town of North Brookfield, Mark Smith, Ryan Daley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Town of North Brookfield et al
as 4:2022cv40071
Plaintiff:
David Allen Blankenship
Defendant:
Town of North Brookfield, Mark Smith, Ryan Daley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ReserveBar Holdings Corp. v. Lorizio et al
as 1:2022cv11023
Plaintiff:
ReserveBar Holdings Corp.
Defendant:
Jean M. Lorizio, Crystal L. Matthews, Deborah A. Baglio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv30068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Guntlow v. Kelly et al
as 3:2022cv30052
Plaintiff:
Pauline Guntlow
Defendant:
Preston Kelly, Dana Clement, Matthew Meranti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hastay v. Holden et al
as 1:2022cv10439
Plaintiff:
Heather Hastay
Defendant:
Matthew P. Holden, The Massachusetts State Police and The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boylston CP, LLC et al v. Town of Boylston et al
as 4:2021cv40132
Plaintiff:
Boylston CP, LLC, James Haynes and Sewell Gravel Pit, LLC
Defendant:
Town of Boylston, Board of Selectmen for the Town of Boylston, Dennis Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacRae v. Mattos et al
as 1:2021cv11917
Plaintiff:
Kari MacRae
Defendant:
Matthew Mattos and Matthew A Ferron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
