Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Russell v. McDonalds Restaurant et al
as 1:2012cv00396
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R Russell
Defendant:
McDonalds Restaurant, Claudia Wray, Christopher Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SUBWAY:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson et al v. Leonard-Dent et al
as 3:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Archie Robinson, III and A Mop and a Bucket
Defendant:
Marva J Leonard-Dent , Raphael Morton , Gladys Muhammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDonald-Bey v. Springer et al
as 1:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jammal McDonald-Bey
Defendant:
Karen Springer, Andrew J Shweller, Allen County Superior Court of Family Relations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Smith v. McDonalds Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00363
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Defendant:
McDonalds Corporation, Donald Stephens, Sara McBee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macon v. Bartrom et al
as 1:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Kamal K Macon, II
Defendant:
Phillip Bartrom, Anthony, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
