Cases 31 - 40 of 742
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
MAGGITTI v. CAPUZZI et al
as 2:2023cv03185
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. JOHN P. CAPUZZI, SR., DEB RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERKEY v. ALBERT GALLATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2023cv01326
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE M. PERKEY
Defendant:
ALBERT GALLATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUPERINTENDENT CHRISTOPHER PEGG, TROOPER CRAIG P. STUDENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jenner v. Pimm et al
as 3:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Jenner
Defendant:
Trooper Gregory Pimm, Trooper Blade Bernosky, Corporal Jacob Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bet v. WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT et al
as 2:2023cv02368
Plaintiff:
Robin Bet
Defendant:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT and P/O Daniel Dieter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BET v. WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2023cv02368
Plaintiff:
ROBIN BET
Defendant:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and P/O DANIEL DIETER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
