Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hammett v. Dodd et al
as 7:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Brooks Hammett
Defendant:
Phillip L Dodd, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El v. Clover Police Department et al
as 0:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
Antwan Eugene Ford Sen El
Defendant:
Clover Police Department, Phillip Hawkins, C B Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Aurora Technology Inc et al v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 3:2012cv02844
Plaintiff:
Aurora Technology Inc , Phillip Caldwell and Phone-Sweeps LLC
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and Mark Keel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gay v. Columbia Police Dept, City of et al
as 3:2012cv02260
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Gay
Defendant:
Columbia Police Dept, City of, Robert J Benson, Walter E Bales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bridges v. Simpsonville Police Dept Agency et al
as 6:2012cv01198
Plaintiff:
Phillip Andrew Bridges
Defendant:
Simpsonville Police Dept Agency, Jimmy Dale Logan, Blaine Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
