Civil Rights Cases filed in Texas
Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00417
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trentz v. Regular Democratic Party et al
as 4:2014cv00504
Plaintiff: Gary Michael Trentz
Defendant: Regular Democratic Party, FBI/U.S. Attorney & Unknowns, Veterans Administration of Multistate Regions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMeans v. City of Austin Police Dept. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00078
Defendant: City of Austin Police Dept. and Travis County Sherif Dept.
Plaintiff: Bruce M. McMeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wright et al v. Dallas Police Dept
as 3:2012cv03919
Defendant: City Of Dallas Dallas Police Dept
Plaintiff: Michael Wright and Clarence Latson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Paz v. Lubbock Police Dept
as 5:2012cv00078
Plaintiff: Jesus-Abraham H Paz
Defendant: Lubbock Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Perdue Family et al
as 4:2011cv00862
Plaintiff: David Edwards
Defendant: Perdue Family and Ft. Worth Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Perdue Family et al
as 2:2011cv00269
Plaintiff: David Edwards
Defendant: Perdue Family and Ft. Worth Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. Farmers Branch Police Dept.
as 1:2011cv00162
Plaintiff: James E Noble
Defendant: Farmers Branch Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. Farmers Branch Police Dept.
as 3:2011cv02244
Plaintiff: James E Noble
Defendant: Farmers Branch Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00405
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?