Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McCulloch v. Powell et al
as 2:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael McCulloch
Defendant:
Darius Powell , James Dillon , John Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
POWELL v. GREYSTONE CORPORATE REALTY
as 1:2012cv01070
Defendant:
GREYSTONE CORPORATE REALTY
Plaintiff:
JUDY ANN POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v Portland Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
Adam-Wesley Powell
Defendant:
Portland Police Department, Portland Mayor of City of, Portland City Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
as 1:2012cv00452
Plaintiff:
JUDY A. POWELL
Defendant:
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWELL v. PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2012cv00348
Defendant:
PORTLAND CITY COURT, PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF INDIANA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM-WESLEY POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWELL v. INGALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2011cv01174
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, INGALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT and STATE OF INDIANA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
ADAM-WESLEY POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWELL v. ANDERSON CITY UTILITIES et al
as 1:2011cv01103
Plaintiff:
ADAM-WESLEY: POWELL
Defendant:
ANDERSON CITY UTILITIES, CITY OF ANDERSON MAYOR'S OFFICE, COLLECTION SPECIALISTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
