Cases 31 - 40 of 255
Parmlee v. Revenue Sevices
as 3:2021cv01295
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Parmlee
Defendant:
State of Connecticut Department of Revenue Services and Dept. of Revenue Sevices
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricketts v. Mallett et al
as 3:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
Robert Ricketts, S. R. and J. R.
Defendant:
Flaherty Legal Group, LLC, Janelle Mallett, Rich Rochlin Law Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cotton v. Police Department
as 3:2020cv01876
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport and City of Bridgeport Police Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Ruane et al v. Carroll
as 3:2020cv00813
Plaintiff:
Juan Vasquez, Miguel Castro, James J. Ruane and others
Defendant:
Patrick Carroll, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2020cv00537
Defendant:
Donald Trump and Richard Blumenthal
Plaintiff:
Robert Sarhan, Barbara Stone and Lesa M Martino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross et al v. Mellekas et al
as 3:2020cv00319
Plaintiff:
Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Domenic Basile, Connecticut Citizens Defense League, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Richard J Colangelo, Jr., James C. Rovella and Stavros Mellekas
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Dutkiewicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
