Cases 31 - 40 of 48
RANKIN et al v. HALL et al
as 2:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
MARK RANKIN and KELLY BENNETT
Defendant:
DAVID HALL, ANDREW FEENEY and UNKNOWN SHERIFF'S OFFICERS AND/OR OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANCHESTER v. ACKERMAN et al
as 2:2015cv00473
Plaintiff:
TARA LEE MANCHESTER
Defendant:
BRIAN ACKERMAN and UNKNOWN SHERIFF'S OFFICE OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINENI III v. ESTABROOK et al
as 2:2015cv00368
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J SINENI III
Defendant:
JAMES ESTABROOK, BRIAN ACKERMAN and UNKNOWN SHERIFF OFFICE OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JONATHAN SMITH, EARL SAUNDERS, CHARLES HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADDOCKS v. PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
DALE MADDOCKS
Defendant:
PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL SAUSCHUCK, JESSICA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENNEY v. MANGINO et al
as 2:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
VICKI MCKENNEY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS MANGINO , CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and WINDHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS et al
as 2:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E SULLIVAN, II
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS and UNKNOWN CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL CORRECTIONS OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WITHAM v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
GLEN A WITHAM
Defendant:
ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE , ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , GUY DESJARDINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TENCZAR et al v. WELSH et al
as 2:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS TENCZAR
Defendant:
STEPHEN WELSH , DAVID HALL , PETER ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
