Cases 31 - 40 of 94
MONTES v. ROC-A-FELLA et al
as 1:2018cv02081
Defendant:
PGA OF AMERICA, NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHETIC ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL BOXING FEDERATION and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO MONTES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Coyle Public Schools et al
as 5:2018cv00808
Defendant:
Coyle School Board of Education, Tenny Maker, Josh Sumrall and others
Plaintiff:
Mischa Smith and Patrick Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02499
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Curry v. Scully et al
as 2:2017cv02372
Plaintiff:
David Henry Curry
Defendant:
Jan Scully, Sacramento Sheriff's Dept. (Carmichael), Jennifer Rauzy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
L. Ruther v. Woman Tennis Assn, et al
as 17-7149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L. Ruther
Defendant - Appellee:
Woman Tennis Assn and United States Tennis Assn
Robert Mann, Sr., et al v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 17-17048
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT MANN, Sr., VERN MURPHY-MANN, DEBORAH MANN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT and SAMUEL D. SOMERS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN C. TENNIS and RANDY R. LOZOYA
Sheppard v. United States Tennis Association Incorporated et al
as 1:2017cv05719
Defendant:
Michael J. Rodriguez and United States Tennis Association Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Tarik Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
