Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Anderson v. University of Tennessee (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Boyd Eugene Anderson
Defendant:
University of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bordages v. United States Justice Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
James Harry Hebert Bordages, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Justice Dept., United States Dept. of Homeland Security, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DePinto v. Hamilton County, TN et al
as 1:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
Frank DePinto
Defendant:
Hamilton County, TN, Jim Coppinger, Mike Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elberger v. University of Tennessee Health Science Center
as 2:2013cv02457
Plaintiff:
Andrea Elberger
Defendant:
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ae-Kyung Yi, Ph. D. v. University of Tennessee, et al
as 13-5819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AE-KYUNG YI, PH. D.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
