Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ELLERBE v. THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
as 2:2011cv07167
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE FULLERTON MPO et al
as 2:2011cv06250
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE FULLERTON MPO, UNITED STATES POST OFFICE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE FULLERTON MPO et al
as 2:2011cv06251
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE FULLERTON MPO, UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruddy v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2011cv01100
Plaintiff:
Michael J Ruddy and Cherilynn M. Ruddy
Defendant:
United States Of America, US Postmaster Potter, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Evans v. Potter et al
as 1:2010cv02557
Plaintiff:
Gary Evans
Defendant:
John E. Potter and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renna v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2010cv01153
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Renna
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Jiminez v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2010cv00897
Plaintiff:
Milton C. Jiminez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
