Cases 31 - 40 of 403
COBB v. UNITED STATES GOVERMENT et al
as 4:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
HOMER DOUGLAS COBB, IV
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERMENT, DONALD J TRUMP, MICHAEL R PENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. National Law Enforcement et al
as 1:2023cv02836
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
National Law Enforcement, Bill Phillips, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv02810
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Glass v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2023cv01979
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Seay v. The United States et al
as 1:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
The United States, State of Georgia and Ashley Stinson
Cartman v. The United States
as 1:2023cv01188
Petitioner:
Anthony-Vincent Cartman
Respondent:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Keisha Jones
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Randell Jackson, Sheriff Tim Pounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan: Ronya-Darrelle v. The United States et al.
as 1:2023cv00367
Respondent:
The United States and The State of Georgia
Claimant:
Morgan: Ronya-Darrelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
