Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Nielsen v. Hagel
as 1:2013cv01581
Plaintiff:
Walter Nielsen
Defendant:
Chuck Hagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dwayne et al v. Sisson et al
as 7:2012cv00492
Plaintiff:
All members for the Cherokee nation of Indians and the Cherrokees in America as in Haeres natus - Heir born, and natural heir, Madison Anne, Susan Annette and others
Defendant:
Trevor Harris, Chris Heidt, Allan Klein and others
And All Under His Control:
Mark Sisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaplin v. Maas et al
as 3:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Walter Chaplin
Defendant:
Randall Fisher, Daniel Maas and Joe Tyree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaplin v. Maas et al
as 5:2012cv30028
Plaintiff:
Walter Chaplin
Defendant:
Randall Fisher, Daniel Maas and Joe Tyree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. County of Accomack et al
as 2:2012cv00305
Plaintiff:
Henrick Townsend
Defendant:
County of Accomack, David Fluhart, Steven Miner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitner v. United States et al
as 1:2012cv00480
Plaintiff:
Khalifah Iman Whitner
Defendant:
United States, Fidelity Investments, J.P. Morgan & Chase N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mallory v. Fahey et al
as 3:2010cv00283
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ruffin Mallory
Defendant:
Helen Fahey and Walter Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burnley v. Norwood et al
as 3:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers Burnley
Defendant:
Bryan T. Norwood, John Venuti, Howard J. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
