Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WEEKLEY v. FRANZOSO et al
as 3:2015cv00722
Plaintiff:
DAVID WEEKLEY
Defendant:
NICKOLAS J. FRANZOSO, CHRISTOPHER MORRISON, CITY OF MANVILLE, N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Weekley, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 14-56210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD WEEKLEY, Jr.
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Defendant - Appellee:
MIGUEL REYNOSO, Officer, ARTURO GONZALEZ, Officer, FRANCISCO ULLOA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Weekley v. Lowell B Ellis et al
as 5:2014cv01043
Defendant:
Dan A. Bluff, Does, Lowell B. Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
John Weekley
Martino Recchia v. City of Los Angeles Department, et al
as 13-57002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTINO RECCHIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES, North Central Animal Care Center, 3201 Lacy Street, Los Angeles, CA 90031, Tel: 213-485-8855, Tel: 888-452-7381, RODRIGUEZ, ACO, (Activity No. A11-031309), in her individual capacity and R. WEEKLEY, ACO, (ID No. 0999082) in his individual capacity
Ronald Weekley v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv04760
Defendant:
20 Unknown Other Named Defendants and City of Los Angeles
Plaintiff:
Ronald Weekley, Jr
Iris Weekley v. Nick Embry
as 13-12764
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IRIS WEEKLEY, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeffery Weekley and o/b/o KW as Survivor
Defendant - Appellant:
NICK EMBRY, In His Individual Capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
