Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Simmons v. Cannon et al
as 2:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Jr , Charleston County , Mase and Company LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Charles E Masencup and Mase and Company LLC
Cross_defendant:
Al Cannon, Jr and Charleston County
Counter_claimant:
Charles E Masencup and Mase and Company LLC
Counter_defendant:
Roosevelt Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Montgomery v. Willis et al
as 2:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
Terrell Rhodes Montgomery
Defendant:
Adam Mason Willis, Mount Pleasant Police Department, Donald Higgins Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Garfinkel et al
as 2:2010cv03107
Plaintiff:
Harold Simmons, Jr
Defendant:
Paul W Garfinkel and Pamela Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cayce Public Safety et al
as 3:2010cv02824
Plaintiff:
Dwight Xavier Jones
Defendant:
Cayce Public Safety, J Merrill and Jeff Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv02459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Freeland v. Simmons et al
as 4:2009cv01384
Plaintiff:
Samuel Nathan Freeland
Defendant:
Jonathan Simmons and Joseph Dorio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Eastover, Town of et al
as 3:2009cv00475
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gibson
Defendant:
Eastover, Town of, Chezdent Thompson, Timothy Ford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2008cv03431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Pepsi Bottling Group et al
as 2:2008cv02281
Plaintiff:
Wesley Edward Smith, III
Defendant:
Pepsi Bottling Group, Lynn Holly, John T Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
