Cases 31 - 40 of 18,605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Zellers v. Fifth 3rd Bank
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Zellers, Jr.
Defendant:
Fifth 3rd Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Laukka et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael Laukka and Heidi Wettberg
Defendant:
Ontonagon County and Michele Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Anagonye v. Transform Automotive LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11251
Plaintiff:
Clare Anagonye
Defendant:
Transform Automotive LLC, Means Industires Inc, Amvehicle Corporation and others
Lima Township Residents et al v. Lima Township Board et al
as 2:2024cv10666
Plaintiff:
Lima Township Residents and Citizens of Lima for Cannabis
Defendant:
Lima Township Board, Duane Luick, Nanette Havens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
