Cases 431 - 440 of 18,733
Davis v. Beacon Lodge House et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Davis
Defendant:
Beacon Lodge House, Darren Hodgdon and April McCreery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Glynn v. Marquette City Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Shanna M. Glynn
Defendant:
Marquette City Police Department and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Middlebrook #351947 v. Lindsay
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Marcus Donte Middlebrook #351947
Defendant:
Unknown Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Moffett v. Platform Chroma LLC
as 5:2024cv10295
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Moffett
Defendant:
Platform Chroma LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shephard v. St. Clair County Community Mental Health
as 2:2024cv10303
Plaintiff:
Austyn Shephard
Defendant:
St. Clair County Community Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DeSchutter et al v. Thompson, et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeSchutter and Renee DeSchutter
Defendant:
Antrim County Road Commission, Burt Thompson, Peter Hoogerhyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sierra et al v. Magic Window Company
as 2:2024cv10292
Plaintiff:
Nick Sierra, John Sheehan and Molly Peterson
Defendant:
Magic Window Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Arthur v. Krause et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Danielle Arthur
Defendant:
Douglas Krause and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
